The painting itself consists of everyday household objects. But there is something wrong with the composition of the painting. It appears the scale of each object is wrong and not realistic. This style follows Naïve art because of the use of bright colours and the fact there is no reason behind the objects being miss proportioned. It is clearly evident that the composition consists of mismatched objects of wrong sizes, such as the light bulb and pencil sharpener are larger that the chair which in really life would be seen as absurd.
Another thing in this painting that is not realistic is the perspective of each object is different and that they are all learning at different angles for example the pencil sharpener is learning forward so you can see the detail on the top and Metronome is learning back. Its appears Craig Martin as done this so that each abject is show most of is detail in the rather than hidden away, this is evident with the two draws in the background of the image are leant forward so the viewer an see the detail within the frame. Also the use of flat colour and the think black line of the image add to the flatness of the composition even though there is lines giving the object dimension because the colour is flat and no shades of the same colour the image still appears flat.
I fell the way the composition is set out is successful and Michael-Craig Martin cleverly presents each object within frame so the viewer asks and wonders whats different about this piece.

*www.Wikipedia.com
No comments:
Post a Comment